Paper detail

Performance limits of adaptive-optics/high-contrast imagers with pyramid wave-front sensors

Advanced AO systems will likely utilise Pyramid wave-front sensors (PWFS) over the traditional Shack-Hartmann sensor in the quest for increased sensitivity, peak performance and ultimate contrast. Here, we wish to bring knowledge and quantify the PWFS theoretical limits as a means to highlight its properties and use cases. We explore forward models for the PWFS in the spatial-frequency domain for they prove quite useful since a) they emanate directly from physical-optics (Fourier) diffraction theory; b) provide a straightforward path to meaningful error breakdowns, c) allow for reconstruction algorithms with $O (n\,log(n))$ complexity for large-scale systems and d) tie in seamlessly with decoupled (distributed) optimal predictive dynamic control for performance and contrast optimisation. All these aspects are dealt with here. We focus on recent analytical PWFS developments and demonstrate the performance using both analytic and end-to-end simulations. We anchor our estimates with observed on-sky contrast on existing systems and then show very good agreement between analytical and Monte-Carlo estimates for the PWFS. For a potential upgrade of existing high-contrast imagers on 10\,m-class telescopes with visible or near-infrared PWFS, we show under median conditions at Paranal a contrast improvement (limited by chromatic and scintillation effects) of 2x-5x by replacing the wave-front sensor alone at large separations close to the AO control radius where aliasing dominates, and factors in excess of 10x by coupling distributed control with the PWFS over most of the AO control region, from small separations starting with the Inner Working Angle of typically 1-2 $λ/D$ to the AO correction edge (here 20 $λ/D$).

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.