Paper detail

Performance Indicator in Multilinear Compressive Learning

Recently, the Multilinear Compressive Learning (MCL) framework was proposed to efficiently optimize the sensing and learning steps when working with multidimensional signals, i.e. tensors. In Compressive Learning in general, and in MCL in particular, the number of compressed measurements captured by a compressive sensing device characterizes the storage requirement or the bandwidth requirement for transmission. This number, however, does not completely characterize the learning performance of a MCL system. In this paper, we analyze the relationship between the input signal resolution, the number of compressed measurements and the learning performance of MCL. Our empirical analysis shows that the reconstruction error obtained at the initialization step of MCL strongly correlates with the learning performance, thus can act as a good indicator to efficiently characterize learning performances obtained from different sensor configurations without optimizing the entire system.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.