Paper detail

Performance Evaluation of the Random Replacement Policy for Networks of Caches

The overall performance of content distribution networks as well as recently proposed information-centric networks rely on both memory and bandwidth capacities. In this framework, the hit ratio is the key performance indicator which captures the bandwidth / memory tradeoff for a given global performance.This paper focuses on the estimation of the hit ratio in a network of caches that employ the Random replacement policy. Assuming that requests are independent and identically distributed, general expressions of miss probabilities for a single Random cache are provided as well as exact results for specific popularity distributions. Moreover, for any Zipf popularity distribution with exponent $α$ > 1, we obtain asymptotic equivalents for the miss probability in the case of large cache size. We extend the analysis to networks of Random caches, when the topology is either a line or a homogeneous tree. In that case, approximations for miss probabilities across the network are derived by assuming that miss events at any node occur independently in time; the obtained results are compared to the same network using the Least-Recently-Used discipline, already addressed in the literature. We further analyze the case of a mixed tandem cache network where the two nodes employ either Random or Least-Recently-Used policies. In all scenarios, asymptotic formulas and approximations are extensively compared to simulations and shown to perform very well. Finally, our results enable us to propose recommendations for cache replacement disciplines in a network dedicated to content distribution. These results also hold for a cache using the First-In-First-Out policy.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.