Paper detail

Performance Evaluation of SCM-WDM System Using Different Linecoding

This paper investigates the theoretical performance analysis for a subcarrier multiplexed (SCM) wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) optical transmission system in presence of optical beat interference (OBI) which occurs during the photo detection process. We have presented a comparison for improving the performance of SCM-WDM system in presence of OBI. Non-return-to zero (NRZ), Manchester and Miller code (MC) line coding are used for performance investigation of SCM-WDM system. A suitable signal bandwidth is selected and 200 KHz is considered as channel bandwidth. Power spectrum of signal and cross component for those line coding are analyzed. Comparison results are evaluated in terms of signal to OBI ratio for the three linecoding schemes which is called signal to interference ratio (SIR). It is found that there is a significant increase in the SIR by employing Miller code compared to NRZ and Manchester for the same data rate. For example, for a number of subcarriers of 10, the achievable SIR is about -24 dB for Miller coded system compared to -46 dB for NRZ coded system and -49 dB for Manchester coded system. The results are found to be satisfactorily agreed with the expected results.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.