Paper detail

Performance Analysis of the Gaussian Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Approach for Independent Vector Analysis

Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimation requires precise knowledge of the underlying statistical model. In Quasi ML (QML), a presumed model is used as a substitute to the (unknown) true model. In the context of Independent Vector Analysis (IVA), we consider the Gaussian QML Estimate (QMLE) of the demixing matrices set and present an (approximate) analysis of its asymptotic separation performance. In Gaussian QML the sources are presumed to be Gaussian, with covariance matrices specified by some "educated guess". The resulting quasi-likelihood equations of the demixing matrices take a special form, recently termed an extended "Sequentially Drilled" Joint Congruence (SeDJoCo) transformation, which is reminiscent of (though essentially different from) classical joint diagonalization. We show that asymptotically this QMLE, i.e., the solution of the resulting extended SeDJoCo transformation, attains perfect separation (under some mild conditions) regardless of the sources' true distributions and/or covariance matrices. In addition, based on the "small-errors" assumption, we present a first-order perturbation analysis of the extended SeDJoCo solution. Using the resulting closed-form expressions for the errors in the solution matrices, we provide closed-form expressions for the resulting Interference-to-Source Ratios (ISRs) for IVA. Moreover, we prove that asymptotically the ISRs depend only on the sources' covariances, and not on their specific distributions. As an immediate consequence of this result, we provide an asymptotically attainable lower bound on the resulting ISRs. We also present empirical results, corroborating our analytical derivations, of three simulation experiments concerning two possible model errors - inaccurate covariance matrices and sources' distribution mismodeling.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.