Paper detail

Performance Analysis of Novel Propellant Oxidizers using Molecular Modelling and Nozzle Flow Simulations

The primary target of this paper is to present novel compounds in view of their possible use as oxidizers in propulsion applications using molecular modeling calculations and supersonic flow simulations. Carbon-based heterocyclic compounds tend to have strained molecular structures leading to high heats of formation and energetic behavior. In the present work, molecular modeling calculations for molecules of 37 such potential propellant oxidizers are presented. Density functional theory (B3LYP) was employed for the geometry optimization of the proposed molecular structures using the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set. Heats of formation of the compounds were calculated using the molecular modeling results. Appropriate propellant compositions were considered with the proposed compounds as oxidizer components and Ideal specific impulse (Ivac,ideal*) was calculated for each composition assuming isentropic flow, computed using the NASA CEA software package. To predict the actual delivered specific impulse (Ivac,act*), supersonic nozzle flow simulations of equilibrium product gases of each propellant composition have been carried out using OpenFOAM. The standard k-epsilon turbulence model for compressible flows including rapid distortion theory (RDT) based compression term, has been employed. As the problem is inherently transient in nature, local time stepping (LTS) methodology has been further implemented to reach a steady-state solution. These simulations accounted for divergence losses, turbulence losses and boundary layer losses and gave a more realistic estimation of the specific impulse. It was observed that the Ivac,act* for all propellant compositions lie between 88% to 91% of the corresponding ideal value. The newly proposed oxidizers showed considerable improvement in propulsion performance as compared to ammonium perchlorate.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.