Paper detail

Performance Analysis of NOMA Uplink Networks under Statistical QoS Delay Constraints

In the fifth generation and beyond (B5G), delayconstraints emerge as a topic of particular interest, e.g. forultra-reliable low latency communications (URLLC) such asautonomous vehicles and enhanced reality. In this paper, westudythe performance of a two-user uplink NOMA network understatistical quality of service (QoS) delay constraints, capturedthrough each user s effective capacity (EC). We propose novelclosed-form expressions for the EC of the NOMA users andshow that in the high signal to noise ratio (SNR) region, the 'strong' NOMA user has a limited EC, assuming the same delayconstraint as the 'weak' user. We demonstrate that for the weakuser, OMA achieves higher EC than NOMA at small values ofthe transmit SNR, while NOMA outperforms OMA in terms ofEC at high SNRs. On the other hand, for the strong user theopposite is true, i.e., NOMA achieves higher EC than OMA atsmall SNRs, while OMA becomes more beneficial at high SNRs.This result raises the question of introducing 'adaptive' OMA /NOMA policies, based jointly on the users delay constraints aswell as on the available transmit power.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.