Paper detail

Percolation on the gene regulatory network

We consider a simplified model for gene regulation, where gene expression is regulated by transcription factors (TFs), which are single proteins or protein complexes. Proteins are in turn synthesised from expressed genes, creating a feedback loop of regulation. This leads to a directed bipartite network in which a link from a gene to a TF exists if the gene codes for a protein contributing to the TF, and a link from a TF to a gene exists if the TF regulates the expression of the gene. Both genes and TFs are modelled as binary variables, which indicate, respectively, whether a gene is expressed or not, and a TF is synthesised or not. We consider the scenario where for a TF to be synthesised, all of its contributing genes must be expressed. This results in an ``AND'' gate logic for the dynamics of TFs. By adapting percolation theory to directed bipartite graphs, evolving according to the AND logic dynamics, we are able to determine the necessary conditions, in the network parameter space, under which bipartite networks can support a multiplicity of stable gene expression patterns, under noisy conditions, as required in stable cell types. In particular, the analysis reveals the possibility of a bi-stability region, where the extensive percolating cluster is or is not resilient to perturbations. This is remarkably different from the transition observed in standard percolation theory. Finally, we consider perturbations involving single node removal that mimic gene knockout experiments. Results reveal the strong dependence of the gene knockout cascade on the logic implemented in the underlying network dynamics, highlighting in particular that avalanche sizes cannot be easily related to gene-gene interaction networks.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.