Paper detail

Percolation on infinite graphs and isoperimetric inequalities

We consider the Bernoulli bond percolation process (with parameter $p$) on infinite graphs and we give a general criterion for bounded degree graphs to exhibit a non-trivial percolation threshold based either on a single isoperimetric inequality if the graph has a bi-infinite geodesic, or two isoperimetric inequalities if the graph has not a bi-infinite geodesic. This new criterion extends previous criteria and brings together a large class of amenable graphs (such as regular lattices) and non-amenable graphs (such trees). We also study the finite connectivity in graphs satisfying the new general criterion and show that graphs in this class with a bi-infinite geodesic always have finite connectivity functions with exponential decay as $p$ is sufficiently close to one. On the other hand, we show that there are graphs in the same class with no bi-infinite geodesic for which the finite connectivity decays sub-exponentially (down to polynomially) in the highly supercritical phase even for $p$ arbitrarily close to one.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.