Paper detail

Percolation of random nodal lines

We prove a Russo-Seymour-Welsch percolation theorem for nodal domains and nodal lines associated to a natural infinite dimensional space of real analytic functions on the real plane. More precisely, let $U$ be a smooth connected bounded open set in $\mathbb R^2$ and $γ, γ'$ two disjoint arcs of positive length in the boundary of $U$. We prove that there exists a positive constant $c$, such that for any positive scale $s$, with probability at least $c$ there exists a connected component of $\{x\in \bar U, \, f(sx) \textgreater{} 0\} $ intersecting both $γ$ and $γ'$, where $f$ is a random analytic function in the Wiener space associated to the real Bargmann-Fock space. For $s$ large enough, the same conclusion holds for the zero set $\{x\in \bar U, \, f(sx) = 0\} $. As an important intermediate result, we prove that sign percolation for a general stationary Gaussian field can be made equivalent to a correlated percolation model on a lattice.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.