Paper detail

Perceptual Quality of Video with Periodic Frame Rate and Quantization Variation-Subjective Studies and Analytical Modeling

In networked video applications, the frame rate (FR) and quantization stepsize (QS) of a compressed video are often adapted in response to the changes of the available bandwidth. It is important to understand how do the variation of FR and QS and their variation pattern affect the video quality. In this paper, we investigate the impact of temporal variation of FR and QS on the perceptual video quality. Among all possible variation patterns, we focus on videos in which two FR's (or QS's) alternate over a fixed interval. We explore the human responses to such variation by conducting subjective evaluation of test videos with different variation magnitudes and frequencies. We further analyze statistical significance of the impact of variation magnitude, variation frequency, video content, and their interactions. By analyzing the subjective ratings, we propose two models for predicting the quality of video with alternating FR and QS, respectively, The proposed models have simple mathematical forms with a few content-dependent parameters. The models fit the measured data very well using parameters determined by least square fitting with the measured data. We further propose some guidelines for adaptation of FR and QS based on trends observed from subjective test results.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.