Paper detail

Perception of categories: from coding efficiency to reaction times

Reaction-times in perceptual tasks are the subject of many experimental and theoretical studies. With the neural decision making process as main focus, most of these works concern discrete (typically binary) choice tasks, implying the identification of the stimulus as an exemplar of a category. Here we address issues specific to the perception of categories (e.g. vowels, familiar faces, ...), making a clear distinction between identifying a category (an element of a discrete set) and estimating a continuous parameter (such as a direction). We exhibit a link between optimal Bayesian decoding and coding efficiency, the latter being measured by the mutual information between the discrete category set and the neural activity. We characterize the properties of the best estimator of the likelihood of the category, when this estimator takes its inputs from a large population of stimulus-specific coding cells. Adopting the diffusion-to-bound approach to model the decisional process, this allows to relate analytically the bias and variance of the diffusion process underlying decision making to macroscopic quantities that are behaviorally measurable. A major consequence is the existence of a quantitative link between reaction times and discrimination accuracy. The resulting analytical expression of mean reaction times during an identification task accounts for empirical facts, both qualitatively (e.g. more time is needed to identify a category from a stimulus at the boundary compared to a stimulus lying within a category), and quantitatively (working on published experimental data on phoneme identification tasks).

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.