Paper detail

Pebble-Depth

In this paper we introduce a new formulation of Bennett's logical depth based on pebble transducers. This notion is defined based on the difference between the minimal length descriptional complexity of prefixes of infinite sequences from the perspective of finite-state transducers and pebble transducers. Our notion of pebble-depth satisfies the three fundamental properties of depth: i.e. easy sequences and random sequences are not deep, and the existence of a slow growth law type result. We also compare pebble-depth to other depth notions based on finite-state transducers, pushdown compressors and the Lempel-Ziv $78$ compression algorithm. We first demonstrate that there exists a normal pebble-deep sequence even though there is no normal finite-state-deep sequence. We then show that there exists a sequence which has pebble-depth level of roughly $1/2$ and Lempel-Ziv-depth level of roughly $0$. Finally we show the existence of a sequence which has a pebble-depth level of roughly $1$ and a pushdown-depth level of roughly $1/2$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.