Paper detail

Peaks within peaks and the possible two-peak structure of the Pc(4457): the effective field theory perspective

The LHCb pentaquarks -- the $P_c(4312)$, $P_c(4440)$ and $P_c(4457)$ -- have been theorized to be $Σ_c \bar{D}$ and $Σ_c \bar{D}^*$ S-wave molecules. Here we explore the possibility that two of these pentaquarks -- the $P_c(4440)$ and $P_c(4457)$ -- contain in addition a $Λ_c(2595) \bar{D}$ component in P-wave. We will analyze the effects of this extra channel within two effective field theories: the first one will be a standard contact-range effective field theory and the second one will include the non-diagonal pion dynamics connecting the $Σ_c \bar{D}^*$ and $Λ_c(2595) \bar{D}$ channels, which happens to be unusually long-ranged. The impact of the coupled-channel dynamics between the $Σ_c \bar{D}^*$ and $Λ_c(2595) \bar{D}$ components is modest at best for the $P_c(4440)$ and $P_c(4457)$, which will remain to be predominantly $Σ_c \bar{D}^*$ molecules. However, if the quantum numbers of the $P_c(4457)$ are $J^P = \frac{1}{2}^-$, the coupled-channel dynamics is likely to induce the binding of a $Λ_c(2595) \bar{D}$ S-wave molecule (coupled to $Σ_c \bar{D}^*$ in P-wave) with $J^P = \frac{1}{2}^+$ and a mass similar to the $P_c(4457)$. If this is the case, the $P_c(4457)$ could actually be a double peak containing two different pentaquark states.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.