Paper detail

Peaks and dips in Gaussian random fields: a new algorithm for the shear eigenvalues, and the excursion set theory

We present a new algorithm to sample the constrained eigenvalues of the initial shear field associated with Gaussian statistics, called the `peak/dip excursion-set-based' algorithm, at positions which correspond to peaks or dips of the correlated density field. The computational procedure is based on a new formula which extends Doroshkevich's unconditional distribution for the eigenvalues of the linear tidal field, to account for the fact that halos and voids may correspond to maxima or minima of the density field. The ability to differentiate between random positions and special points in space around which halos or voids may form (peaks/dips), encoded in the new formula and reflected in the algorithm, naturally leads to a straightforward implementation of an excursion set model for peaks and dips in Gaussian random fields - one of the key advantages of this sampling procedure. In addition, it offers novel insights into the statistical description of the cosmic web. As a first physical application, we show how the standard distributions of shear ellipticity and prolateness in triaxial models of structure formation are modified by the constraint. In particular, we provide a new expression for the conditional distribution of shape parameters given the density peak constraint, which generalizes some previous literature work. The formula has important implications for the modeling of non-spherical dark matter halo shapes, in relation to their initial shape distribution. We also test and confirm our theoretical predictions for the individual distributions of eigenvalues subjected to the extremum constraint, along with other directly related conditional probabilities. Finally, we indicate how the proposed sampling procedure naturally integrates into the standard excursion set model, potentially solving some of its well-known problems, and into the ellipsoidal collapse framework. (abridged)

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.