Paper detail

Peak statistics for the primordial black hole abundance

The primordial black hole (PBH) abundance evaluated by the conventional Press-Schechter (PS) probability distribution is shown to be equivalent to the high-peak limit of a special point-like peak statistics via unphysical dimensionality reduction of the Bardeen-Bond-Kaiser-Szalay (BBKS) theory. The fact that PBHs are formed at high peak values $ν_c \gg 1$ leads to a systematic bias proportional to $ν_c^3$ between the predictions of the PS method and the physical BBKS peak theory in a general three-dimensional spatial configuration. As long as realistic PBHs are collapsed from three-dimensional density peaks in space, the systematic bias led by $ν_c^3$ implies a significant underestimation of the PBH abundance reported by the PS method. For the inflationary spectrum in the narrow-spike class, the underestimation in the extended mass functions is further enlarged by at least a factor of $10^{2.5}$ in all mass range, indicating a severer constraint to models in the favor of considering PBHs as all dark matter in a certain mass range.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.