Paper detail

Peak Quasar Correlation Across the Sky, and in an Earth-Wide Bell Test

Viewing two astronomical sources at large enough distance and angular separation can assure, by light-travel-time arguments, the acausality of their emitted photons. Using such photons to set apparatus parameters in a laboratory-based quantum-mechanical experiment could ensure those switch settings are independent and fair, allowing a loophole-free test of Bell's inequality. Quasars are a natural choice for this task, yet at ultimate extent it involves their simultaneous photometry towards opposite directions on the sky, which is untried. Cosmic isotropy can be invoked to set limits there, leaving fairness intact for causal pairs, but with a testable consequence of asymmetric bias: mean brightness correlations found less flat in sky angle than random, more acutely so inside a horizon of 90 degrees. Analysis of one dataset from the Gemini twin telescopes is presented, using over 14 years of archival broadband-optical images, serendipitously sampling thousands of quasars up to 180 degrees apart. These data reject a null result of no correlation with 97.7% confidence, instead consistent with a 3-sigma residual signal of 0.21 mag peaked at 65+/-3 degrees separation. Possible confirmatory observations are pointed to along with the improved experimental protocol of an Earth-wide test.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.