Paper detail

Peak-Nadir Encoding for Efficient CGM Data Compression and High-Fidelity Reconstruction

Aim/background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) generates dense time-series data, posing challenges for efficient storage, transmission, and analysis. This study evaluates novel encoding strategies that reduce CGM profiles to a compact set of landmark points while maintaining fidelity in reconstructed signals and derived glycemic metrics. Methods: We utilized two complementary CGM datasets, synthetic data generated via a Conditional Generative Adversarial Network (CGAN) and real-world measurements from a randomized crossover trial, to develop and validate three encoding approaches: (1) Peaks & Nadirs (PN), (2) Peaks, Nadirs, and Support Points (PN+), and (3) Uniform Downsampling. Each method compresses CGM profiles by selecting key timestamps and glucose values, followed by signal reconstruction via interpolation. Performance was assessed using compression ratio, mean absolute error (MAE), and R^2 between original and reconstructed clinically relevant CGM-derived metrics. Statistical analyses evaluated the preservation of clinically relevant glucose features. Results: Across varying compression settings, PN+ consistently outperformed PN and downsampling, achieving the highest R^2 and lowest MAE. At a compression ratio of 13 (22 landmark points per 24-hour profile), PN+ reduced MAE by a factor of 3.6 compared to downsampling (0.77 vs. 2.75), with notable improvements in metrics sensitive to glucose excursions. Encoding and decoding required an average of 0.13 seconds per profile. Validation on real-world data confirmed these trends. Conclusions: The proposed PN+ method produces a compact CGM representation that retains critical glycemic dynamics while discarding redundant portions of the profiles. The CGM signal can be reconstructed with high precision from the encoding representation.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.