Paper detail

PBH mass growth through radial accretion during the radiation dominated era

We model the radial accretion of radiation on Primordial Black Holes (PBH) by numerically solving Einstein's equations coupled to an ultrarelativistic ideal gas with equation of state $p=ρ/3$. We calculate the final mass of a black hole by the integration of the accreted radiation energy density during the leptonic era between $t\sim10^{-4}s$ to $t\sim 10^2s$ after the Big Bang. Our results indicate that small PBHs with initial masses between $10^{-4}$ to $1M_{\odot}$ may grow up to hundreds of solar masses, and thus can be SMBH seeds. On the other hand, PBHs formed at $t\sim 1s$ with initial mass between 900 and $\sim 980M_{\odot}$, by the time $t\sim 100s$ show masses of $10^4$ to $10^6M_{\odot}$ which are masses of seeds or already formed SMBHs. The fact that we consider only radial flow implies that our results work well as limiting cases, and it is expected that under more general scenarios the accretion rates may change significantly. Nevertheless we show that it is possible that SMBHs can be PBHs that grew due to the accretion of radiation.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.