Paper detail

Paving the Way for Euclid and JWST via Optimal Selection of High-z Quasars

We introduce a probabilistic approach to select 6<z<8 quasar candidates for spectroscopic follow-up, which is based on density estimation in the high-dimensional space inhabited by the optical and near-infrared photometry. Density distributions are modeled as Gaussian mixtures with principled accounting of errors using the extreme deconvolution (XD) technique, generalizing an approach successfully used to select lower redshift (z<3) quasars. We train the probability density of contaminants on 733,694 7-d flux measurements from the 1076 square degrees overlapping area from the DECaLS (z), VIKING (YJHK), and unWISE (W1W2) imaging surveys, after requiring they dropout of DECaLS g and r, whereas the distribution of high-z quasars are trained on synthetic model photometry. Extensive simulations based on these density distributions and current estimates of the quasar luminosity function indicate that this method achieves a completeness of >75% and an efficiency of >15% for selecting quasars at 6<z<8 with J<21.5. Among the classified sources are 8 known 6<z<7 quasars, of which 2/8 are selected suggesting a completeness ~25%, whereas classifying the 6 known (J<21.5) quasars at z>7 from the entire sky, we select 5/6 or a completeness of ~80%.The failure to select the majority of 6<z<7 quasars arises because our model of quasar SEDs underestimates the scatter in the distribution of fluxes. This new optimal approach to quasar selection paves the way for efficient spectroscopic follow-up of Euclid quasar candidates with ground based telescopes and JWST.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.