Paper detail

Pattern Discovery in Students' Evaluations of Professors: A Statistical Data Mining Approach

The evaluation of instructors by their students has been practiced at most universities for many decades, and there has always been a great interest in a variety of aspects of the evaluations. Are students matured and knowledgeable enough to provide useful and dependable feedback for the improvement of their instructors' teaching skills/abilities? Does the level of difficulty of the course have a strong relationship with the rating the student give an instructor? In this paper, we attempt to answer questions such as these using some state of the art statistical data mining techniques such support vector machines, classification and regression trees, boosting, random forest, factor analysis, kMeans clustering. hierarchical clustering. We explore various aspects of the data from both the supervised and unsupervised learning perspective. The data set analyzed in this paper was collected from a university in Turkey. The application of our techniques to this data reveals some very interesting patterns in the evaluations, like the strong association between the student's seriousness and dedication (measured by attendance) and the kind of scores they tend to assign to their instructors.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.