Paper detail

Pathwise Performance of Debt Based Policies for Wireless Networks with Hard Delay Constraints

Hou et al have introduced a framework to serve clients over wireless channels when there are hard deadline constraints along with a minimum delivery ratio for each client's flow. Policies based on "debt," called maximum debt first policies (MDF) were introduced, and shown to be throughput optimal. By "throughput optimality" it is meant that if there exists a policy that fulfils a set of clients with a given vector of delivery ratios and a vector of channel reliabilities, then the MDF policy will also fulfill them. The debt of a user is the difference between the number of packets that should have been delivered so as to meet the delivery ratio and the number of packets that have been delivered for that client. The maximum debt first (MDF) prioritizes the clients in decreasing order of debts at the beginning of every period. Note that a throughput optimal policy only guarantees that \begin{small} $\liminf_{T \to \infty} \frac{1}{T}\sum_{t=1}^{T} \mathbbm{1}\{\{client $n$'s packet is delivered in frame $t$} \} \geq q_{i}$ \end{small}, where the right hand side is the required delivery ratio for client $i$. Thus, it only guarantees that the debts of each user are $o(T)$, and can be otherwise arbitrarily large. This raises the interesting question about what is the growth rate of the debts under the MDF policy. We show the optimality of MDF policy in the case when the channel reliabilities of all users are same, and obtain performance bounds for the general case. For the performance bound we obtain the almost sure bounds on $\limsup_{t\to\infty}\frac{d_{i}(t)}{ϕ(t)}$ for all $i$, where $ϕ(t) = \sqrt{2t\log\log t}$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.