Paper detail

Pathwise optimal transport bounds between a one-dimensional diffusion and its Euler scheme

In the present paper, we prove that the Wasserstein distance on the space of continuous sample-paths equipped with the supremum norm between the laws of a uniformly elliptic one-dimensional diffusion process and its Euler discretization with $N$ steps is smaller than $O(N^{-2/3+\varepsilon})$ where $\varepsilon$ is an arbitrary positive constant. This rate is intermediate between the strong error estimation in $O(N^{-1/2})$ obtained when coupling the stochastic differential equation and the Euler scheme with the same Brownian motion and the weak error estimation $O(N^{-1})$ obtained when comparing the expectations of the same function of the diffusion and of the Euler scheme at the terminal time $T$. We also check that the supremum over $t\in[0,T]$ of the Wasserstein distance on the space of probability measures on the real line between the laws of the diffusion at time $t$ and the Euler scheme at time $t$ behaves like $O(\sqrt{\log(N)}N^{-1})$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.