Paper detail

Patch-based Carcinoma Detection on Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Images -- A Cross-Site Robustness Assessment

Deep learning technologies such as convolutional neural networks (CNN) provide powerful methods for image recognition and have recently been employed in the field of automated carcinoma detection in confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) images. CLE is a (sub-)surface microscopic imaging technique that reaches magnifications of up to 1000x and is thus suitable for in vivo structural tissue analysis. In this work, we aim to evaluate the prospects of a priorly developed deep learning-based algorithm targeted at the identification of oral squamous cell carcinoma with regard to its generalization to further anatomic locations of squamous cell carcinomas in the area of head and neck. We applied the algorithm on images acquired from the vocal fold area of five patients with histologically verified squamous cell carcinoma and presumably healthy control images of the clinically normal contra-lateral vocal cord. We find that the network trained on the oral cavity data reaches an accuracy of 89.45% and an area-under-the-curve (AUC) value of 0.955, when applied on the vocal cords data. Compared to the state of the art, we achieve very similar results, yet with an algorithm that was trained on a completely disjunct data set. Concatenating both data sets yielded further improvements in cross-validation with an accuracy of 90.81% and AUC of 0.970. In this study, for the first time to our knowledge, a deep learning mechanism for the identification of oral carcinomas using CLE Images could be applied to other disciplines in the area of head and neck. This study shows the prospect of the algorithmic approach to generalize well on other malignant entities of the head and neck, regardless of the anatomical location and furthermore in an examiner-independent manner.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.