Paper detail

Passwords: Divided they Stand, United they Fall

Today, offline attacks are one of the most severe threats to password security. These attacks have claimed millions of passwords from prominent websites including Yahoo, LinkedIn, Twitter, Sony, Adobe and many more. Therefore, as a preventive measure, it is necessary to gauge the offline guessing resistance of a password database and to help users choose secure passwords. The rule-based mechanisms that rely on minimum password length and different character classes are too naive to capture the intricate human behavior whereas those based on probabilistic models require the knowledge of an entire password distribution which is not always easy to learn. In this paper, we propose a space partition attack model which uses information from previous leaks, surveys, attacks and other sources to divide the password search space into non-overlapping partitions and learn partition densities. We prove that the expected success of a partition attacker is maximum if the resulting partitions are explored in decreasing order of density. We show that the proposed attack model is more general and various popular attack techniques including probabilistic-based, dictionary-based, grammar-based and brute-force are just different instances of a partition attacker. Later, we introduce bin attacker, another instance of a partition attacker, and measure the guessing resistance of real-world password databases. We demonstrate that the utilized search space is very small and as a result even a weak attacker can cause sufficient damage to the system. We prove that partition attacks can be countered only if partition densities are uniform. We use this result and propose a system that thwarts partition attacker by distributing users across different partitions. Finally, we demonstrate how some of the well-known password schemes can be adapted to help users in choosing passwords from the system assigned partitions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.