Paper detail

Passive and star-forming galaxies at $1.4 \leq z \leq2.5$ in the Aegis field

Using a simple two-color selection based on $g$-, $z$-, and $K$-band photometry, we pick out 1609 star-forming galaxies (sgzKs) and 422 passively evolving galaxies (pgzKs) at z\sim2$ from a $K$-band-selected sample ($K_{\rm AB} < 22.0$) in an area of $\sim 0.44$ deg$^{2}$ of the All-wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey. The number counts of pgzKs\ in our sample turn over at $K_{\rm AB} \sim 21.0$, and both the number of faint and bright objects (including sgzKs\ and pgzKs) exceed the predictions of a recent semi-analytic model of galaxy formation, a more successful model is need to explain this diversity. We also find that the star formation rate (SFR) and specific SFR (sSFR) of sgzKs\ increases with redshift at all masses, implying that star-forming galaxies were much more active on average in the past. Moreover, the sSFR of massive galaxies is lower at all redshifts, suggesting that star formation contributes more to the mass growth of low-mass galaxies than to high-mass galaxies. From {\it Hubble Space Telescope} Wide Field Camera 3 near-infrared imaging data, we find that morphologies of $z\sim2$ galaxies not only have diffuse structures with lower $G$ and higher $M_{20}$ values, but also have single-object morphologies (higher $G$ and lower $M_{20}$), implying that there are morphological variety and different formation process for these galaxies at $z\sim2$. Finally, we also study the fraction of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in the gzKs, 82 of 828 gzKs\ with four IRAC bands can be classified as AGNs ($\sim$ 10%). Most of these AGN candidates have $L_{\rm 0.5-10\ keV}>10^{41}\,\rm erg\,s^{-1}$.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.