Paper detail

Passenger Path Choice Estimation Using Smart Card Data: A Latent Class Approach with Panel Effects Across Days

Understanding passengers' path choice behavior in urban rail systems is a prerequisite for effective operations and planning. This paper attempts bridging the gap by proposing a probabilistic approach to infer passengers' path choice behavior in urban rail systems using a large-scale smart card data. The model uses latent classes and panel effects to capture passengers' implicit behavior heterogeneity and longitudinal correlations, key research gaps in big data driven behavior studies. We formulate the probability of each individual's arrival time at a destination based on their path choice behavior, and estimate corresponding path choice model parameters as a maximum likelihood estimation problem. The original likelihood function is intractable due to the exponential computation complexity. We derive a tractable likelihood function and propose a numerical integral approach to efficiently estimate the model. Also, we propose a method to calculate the t-statistic of the estimated choice parameters based on the numerically estimated Hessian matrix and Cramer-Rao bound (the lower bound on the coefficient variance). Case studies using synthetic data validate the model performance and its robustness against parameter initialization and input errors, and highlight the importance of incorporating crowding impact in path choice estimation. Applications using actual data from the Mass Transit Railway, Hong Kong reveal two latent groups of passengers: time-sensitive (TS) and comfort-aware (CA). TS passengers are those who are more likely to choose paths with short travel times. Most of them are regular commuters with high travel frequency and less schedule flexibility. CA passengers care more about the travel comfort experience and choose paths with less walking and waiting times. The proposed approach is data-driven and general to accommodate other discrete choice structures.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.