Paper detail

Partitioning algorithms for weighted trees and cactus graphs

In this paper, we consider different constrained partition problems for weighted trees and cactus graphs. We focus on the (l,u)-partition problem, which is the problem of partitioning a weighted graph into connected clusters such that each cluster fulfills the lower and upper weight constraints l and u. Partitioning into a minimum, maximum or a fixed number of clusters is known to be NP-hard in general, but polynomial-time solvable on trees. We prove that these three variants of the (l,u)-partition problem can be solved for cactus graphs as well by presenting a polynomial-time algorithm. Additionally, we present an efficient method to compute the corresponding partitions. For other optimization goals or additional constraints, the partition problem becomes NP-hard - even on trees and for a lower weight bound equal to zero. We show that our method can be used as an algorithmic framework to solve other partition problems for weighted trees and cactus graphs with a pseudopolynomial runtime.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.