Paper detail

Particle dynamics in the central ringlet of Saturn's Encke gap

A kinky and clumpy ringlet shares orbit with the moon Pan in the center of the 320-km wide Encke gap in Saturn's rings (Porco et al., 2005). The ringlet is mainly composed of micron-sized particles (Showalter, 1991, Hedman et al., 2011), implying that these particles may be significantly perturbed by non-gravitational forces, which can limit their lifetimes. We establish a kinetic model considering the birth, evolution, and death of dust in the Encke central ringlet allowing to evaluate the ringlet optical depth. First, we investigate the generation of dust by micrometeorite impacts (the `impact-ejecta' process) on putative, yet undetected embedded moonlets. Taking into account the orbital evolution under the influence of the relevant perturbation forces, the dominant loss mechanisms are collisions with ring particles in the gap edges, the putative moonlets in the gap, or erosion by sputtering in Saturn's plasma environment. However, our results show that this impact-ejecta process alone can only sustain a ringlet of optical depth 3-4 orders of magnitude smaller than the observed values. Consequently, other processes must be taken into account. For example, mutual collisions among putative moonlets should produce dust at about the same rate, while further disruption of ejecta, as proposed by Dikarev (1999), should increase the total amount of particles. Furthermore, observations show an azimuthal asymmetry of the material in the Encke gap ringlets (Ferrari and Brahic 1997, M. Sremčević, private communication). We investigate the scenario proposed by Hedman et al. (2013) that for the Encke central ringlet, the observed asymmetry is mainly due to the combined action of plasma drag and Pan's gravity causing a focusing of dust in the region leading Pan's orbit (Hedman et al. 2013).

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.