Paper detail

Particle acceleration at oblique shocks and discontinuities of the density profile

In the theory of diffusive acceleration at oblique shock fronts the question of the existence of a discontinuity of energetic particle density is contentious. The resolution of this problem is interesting from a theoretical point of view, and potentially for the interpretation of observations of particle densities at heliospheric shocks and of high-resolution radio observations of the rims of supernova remnants. It can be shown analytically that an isotropic particle distribution at a shock front implies continuity of the particle density -- whether or not the shock is oblique. However, if the obliquity of the shock induces an anisotropy, a jump is permitted. Both semi-analytic computations and Monte-Carlo simulations are used to show that, for interesting parameter ranges, a jump is indeed produced, with accelerated particles concentrated in a precursor ahead of the shock front.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.