Paper detail

Partial invariants, large-scale dynamo action, and the inverse transfer of magnetic helicity

The existence of partially conserved enstrophy-like quantities is conjectured to cause inverse energy transfers to develop embedded in magnetohydrodynamical (MHD) turbulence, in analogy to the influence of enstrophy in two-dimensional nonconducting turbulence. By decomposing the velocity and magnetic fields in spectral space onto helical modes, we identify subsets of three-wave (triad) interactions conserving two new enstrophy-like quantities which can be mapped to triad interactions recently identified with facilitating large-scale $α$-type dynamo action and the inverse transfer of magnetic helicity. Due to their dependence on interaction scale locality, the invariants suggest that the inverse transfer of magnetic helicity might be facilitated by both local- and nonlocal-scale interactions, and is a process more local than the $α$-dynamo. We test the predicted embedded (partial) energy fluxes by constructing a shell model (reduced wave-space model) of the minimal set of triad interactions (MTI) required to conserve the ideal MHD invariants. Numerically simulated MTIs demonstrate that, for a range of forcing configurations, the partial invariants are, with some exceptions, indeed useful for understanding the embedded contributions to the total spectral energy flux. Furthermore, we demonstrate that strictly inverse energy transfers may develop if enstrophy-like conserving interactions are favoured, a mechanism recently attributed to the energy cascade reversals found in nonconducting three-dimensional turbulence subject to strong rotation or confinement. The presented results have implications for the understanding of the physical mechanisms behind large-scale dynamo action and the inverse transfer of magnetic helicity, processes thought to be central to large-scale magnetic structure formation.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.