Paper detail

Partial covering of emission regions of Q 0528-250 by intervening H$_2$ clouds

We present an analysis of the molecular hydrogen absorption system at z$_{\rm abs}$ = 2.811 in the spectrum of the blazar Q0528-250. We demonstrate that the molecular cloud does not cover the background source completely. The partial coverage reveals itself as a residual flux in the bottom of saturated H_2 absorption lines. This amounts to about (2.22$\pm$0.54)% of the continuum and does not depend on the wavelength. This value is small and it explains why this effect has not been detected in previous studies of this quasar spectrum. However, it is robustly detected and significantly higher than the zero flux level in the bottom of saturated lines of the Ly-alpha forest, (-0.21$\pm$0.22)%. The presence of the residual flux could be caused by unresolved quasar multicomponents, by light scattered by dust, and/or by jet-cloud interaction. The H$_2$ absorption system is very well described by a two-component model without inclusion of additional components when we take partial coverage into account. The derived total column densities in the H$_2$ absorption components A and B are logN(H$_2$)[cm$^{-2}$] = 18.10$\pm$0.02 and 17.82$\pm$0.02, respectively. HD molecules are present only in component B. Given the column density, logN(HD)= 13.33$\pm$0.02, we find N(HD)/2N(H$_2$)=(1.48$\pm$0.10)x10$^{-5}$, significantly lower than previous estimations. We argue that it is crucial to take into account partial coverage effects for any analysis of H$_2$ bearing absorption systems, in particular when studying the physical state of high-redshift interstellar medium.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.