Paper detail

Parsimony, exhaustivity and balanced detection in neocortex

One fascinating aspect of the brain is its ability to process information in a fast and reliable manner. The functional architecture is thought to play a central role in this task, by encoding efficiently complex stimuli and facilitating higher level processing. In the early visual cortex of higher mammals, information is processed within functional maps whose layout is thought to underlie visual perception. The possible principles underlying the topology of the different maps, as well as the role of a specific functional architecture on information processing, is however poorly understood. We demonstrate mathematically here that two natural principles, local exhaustivity of representation and parsimony, would constrain the orientation and spatial frequency maps to display co-located singularities around which the orientation is organized as a pinwheel and spatial frequency as a dipole. This observation is perfectly in line with new optical imaging data on the cat visual cortex we analyze in a companion paper. Here we further focus on the theoretical implications of this structure. Using a computational model, we show that this architecture allows a trade-off in the local perception of orientation and spatial frequency, but this would occur for sharper selectivity than the tuning width reported in the literature. We therefore re-examined physiological data and show that indeed the spatial frequency selectivity substantially sharpens near maps singularities, bringing to the prediction that the system tends to optimize balanced detection between different attributes. These results shed new light on the principles at play in the emergence of functional architecture of cortical maps, as well as their potential role in processing information.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.