Paper detail

Pareto optimality, economy-effectiveness trade-offs and ion channel degeneracy: Improving population models of neurons

Nerve cells encounter unavoidable evolutionary trade-offs between multiple tasks. They must consume as little energy as possible (be energy-efficient or economical) but at the same time fulfil their functions (be functionally effective). Neurons displaying best performance for such multi-task trade-offs are said to be Pareto optimal. However, it is not understood how ion channel parameters contribute to the Pareto optimal performance of neurons. Ion channel degeneracy implies that multiple combinations of ion channel parameters can lead to functionally similar neuronal behavior. Therefore, to simulate functional behavior, instead of a single model, neuroscientists often use populations of valid models with distinct ion conductance configurations. This approach is called population (also database or ensemble) modeling. It remains unclear, which ion channel parameters in a vast population of functional models are more likely to be found in the brain. Here we propose that Pareto optimality can serve as a guiding principle for addressing this issue. The Pareto optimum concept can help identify the subpopulations of conductance-based models with ion channel configurations that perform best for the trade-off between economy and functional effectiveness. In this way, the high-dimensional parameter space of neuronal models might be reduced to geometrically simple low-dimensional manifolds. Therefore, Pareto optimality is a promising framework for improving population modeling of neurons and their circuits. We also discuss how Pareto inference might help deduce neuronal functions from high-dimensional Patch-seq data. Furthermore, we hypothesize that Pareto optimality might contribute to our understanding of observed ion channel correlations in neurons.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.