Paper detail

Parametrizing Impulsive X-ray Heating with a Cumulative Initial-Temperature Distribution

In collisional ionization equilibrium (CIE), the X-ray spectrum from a plasma depends on the distribution of emission measure over temperature (DEM). Due to the well-known ill conditioning problem, no precisely resolved DEM can be inverted directly from the spectrum, so often only a gross parametrization of the DEM is used to approximate the data, in hopes that the parametrization can provide useful model-independent constraints on the heating process. However, ill conditioning also introduces ambiguity into the various different parametrizations that could approximate the data, which may spoil the perceived advantages of model independence. Thus, this paper instead suggests a single parametrization for both the heating mechanism and the X-ray sources, based on a model of impulsive heating followed by complete cooling. This approach is similar to a ``cooling flow'' approach, but allows injection at multiple initial temperatures, and applies even when the steady state is distribution of different shock strengths, as for a standing shock with a range of obliquities, or for embedded stochastic shocks that are only steady in a statistical sense. This produces an alternative parametrization for X-ray spectra that is especially streamlined for higher density plasmas with efficient radiative cooling, and provides internal consistency checks on the assumption of impulsive heating followed by complete cooling. The result is no longer model independent, but the results are more directly interpretable in terms of useful physical constraints on the impulsive heating distribution.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.