Paper detail

Parametrization of coronal heating: spatial distribution and observable consequences

We investigate the difference in the spatial distribution of the energy input for parametrizations of different mechanisms to heat the corona of the Sun and possible impacts on the coronal emission. We use a 3D MHD model of a solar active region as a reference and compare the Ohmic-type heating in this model to parametrizations for alternating current (AC) and direct current (DC) heating models, in particular, we use Alfven wave and MHD turbulence heating. We extract the quantities needed for these two parametrizations from the reference model and investigate the spatial distribution of the heat input in all three cases, globally and along individual field lines. To study differences in the resulting coronal emission we employ 1D loop models with a prescribed heat input based on the heating rate we extracted along a bundle of field lines. On average, all heating implementations show a roughly drop of the heating rate with height. This also holds for individual field lines. While all mechanism show a concentration of the energy input towards the low parts of the atmosphere, for individual field lines the concentration towards the footpoints is much stronger for the DC mechanisms than for the Alfven wave AC case. In contrast, the AC model gives a stronger concentration of the emission towards the footpoints. This is because the more homogeneous distribution of the energy input leads to higher coronal temperatures and a more extended transition region. The significant difference in the concentration of the heat input towards the foot points for the AC and DC mechanisms, and the pointed difference in the spatial distribution of the coronal emission for these cases shows that the two mechanisms should be discriminable by observations. Before drawing final conclusions, these parametrizations should be implemented in new 3D models in a more self-consistent way.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.