Paper detail

Parametric error bounds for convex approximations of two-stage mixed-integer recourse models with a random second-stage cost vector

We consider two-stage recourse models in which the second-stage problem has integer decision variables and uncertainty in the second-stage cost vector, technology matrix, and the right-hand side vector. Such mixed-integer recourse models are typically non-convex and thus hard to solve. There exist convex approximations of these models with accompanying error bounds. However, it is unclear how these error bounds depend on the distributions of the second-stage cost vector $q$. In fact, the only error bound that is known hinges on the assumption that $q$ has a finite support. In this paper, we derive parametric error bounds whose dependence on the distribution of $q$ is explicit and that hold for any distribution of $q$, provided it has a finite expected $\ell_1$-norm. We find that the error bounds scale linearly in the expected value of the $\ell_1$-norm of $q$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.