Paper detail

Parameterizing the AGN radius -- luminosity relation from the Eigenvector 1 viewpoint

The study of the broad-line region (BLR) using reverberation mapping has allowed us to establish an empirical relation between the size of this line emitting region and the continuum luminosity that drives the line emission (i.e. the R$_{\rm BLR}$-L$_{\rm 5100}$ relation). To realize its full potential, the intrinsic scatter in the R$_{\rm BLR}$-L$_{\rm 5100}$ relation needs to be understood better. The Eddington ratio plays a key role in addressing this problem. On the other hand, the Eigenvector 1 schema has helped to reveal an almost clear connection between the Eddington ratio and the strength of the optical FeII emission which has its origin from the BLR. This paper aims to reveal the connection between theoretical entities, like, the ionization parameter (U) and cloud mean density (n$_{\rm H}$) of the BLR, with physical observables obtained directly from the spectra, such as optical FeII strength (R$_{\rm FeII}$) that has immense potential to trace the accretion rate. We utilize the photoionization code CLOUDY and perform a suite of models to reveal the BLR in the U-n parameter space and estimate RFeII. We compare the SEDs for a prototypical Population A and Population B source, I Zw 1 and NGC 5548, respectively, in this study. The results from the photoionization modelling are combined with existing reverberation mapped sources with observed R$_{\rm FeII}$ estimates, allowing us to provide an analytical formulation to tie together the aforementioned quantities. We utilize the comparison of the modelled equivalent widths for the low-ionization emission lines to their observed values to identify the optimal (U,n$_{\rm H}$). The recovery of the correct physical conditions in the BLR suggests that the BLR `sees' a different, filtered ionizing continuum with only a very small fraction (~1-10%) that leads to the line emission in the dustless, low-ionization BLR.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.