Paper detail

Parameterized Complexity of Bandwidth on Trees

The bandwidth of a $n$-vertex graph $G$ is the smallest integer $b$ such that there exists a bijective function $f : V(G) \rightarrow \{1,...,n\}$, called a layout of $G$, such that for every edge $uv \in E(G)$, $|f(u) - f(v)| \leq b$. In the {\sc Bandwidth} problem we are given as input a graph $G$ and integer $b$, and asked whether the bandwidth of $G$ is at most $b$. We present two results concerning the parameterized complexity of the {\sc Bandwidth} problem on trees. First we show that an algorithm for {\sc Bandwidth} with running time $f(b)n^{o(b)}$ would violate the Exponential Time Hypothesis, even if the input graphs are restricted to be trees of pathwidth at most two. Our lower bound shows that the classical $2^{O(b)}n^{b+1}$ time algorithm by Saxe [SIAM Journal on Algebraic and Discrete Methods, 1980] is essentially optimal. Our second result is a polynomial time algorithm that given a tree $T$ and integer $b$, either correctly concludes that the bandwidth of $T$ is more than $b$ or finds a layout of $T$ of bandwidth at most $b^{O(b)}$. This is the first parameterized approximation algorithm for the bandwidth of trees.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.