Paper detail

Parameterizations of black-hole spacetimes beyond circularity

We discuss parameterizations of black-hole spacetimes in and beyond General Relativity in view of their symmetry constraints: within the class of axisymmetric, stationary spacetimes, we propose a parameterization that includes non-circular spacetimes, both in Boyer-Lindquist as well as in horizon-penetrating coordinates. We show how existing parameterizations, which make additional symmetry assumptions (first, circularity; second, a hidden constant of motion), are included in the new parameterization. Further, we explain why horizon-penetrating coordinates may be more suitable to parameterize non-circular deviations from the Kerr geometry. Our investigation is motivated by our result that the regular, spinning black-hole spacetimes proposed in [1,2] are non-circular. This particular deviation from circularity can result in cusps, a dent and an asymmetry in the photon rings surrounding the black-hole shadow. Finally, we explore a new class of non-circular deviations from Kerr black holes, which promote the spin parameter to a function, and find indications that regularity cannot be achieved in this setting. This result strengthens the case for regular black holes based on a promotion of the mass parameter to a function.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.