Paper detail

Parameterization of hydrodynamic friction in a model for sheared suspensions of rough particles

We propose a method to parameterize a coarse grained model for the hydrodynamic friction between nearly touching rough spheres in suspension flows. The frictional resistance due to surface roughness primarily alters the sliding and rolling modes of motion of rough particles. Stokesian dynamics simulations incorporating a near-field pairwise resistance model accounting for these enhanced frictional modes were employed to compute particle trajectories in shear flow. In this model, the resistance to sliding and rolling modes of motion are augmented from a weakly diverging log$(1/h)$ form for smooth spheres to a strongly diverging $1/h$ form for rough spheres to account for the additional resistance due to squeezing flows between surface asperities, where $h$ is the mean surface separation between particles. We determine new bounds on the relative magnitude of the augmentations to the resistance to different modes of motion using inequality constraints reflecting the positive definiteness of the Stokes resistance tensor for a pair of rough particles. Using the simulations of a particle pair in a shear flow, a simple model for angular rotation rate of the pair centerline is computed as a function of its orientation in the shear flow and the free parameters of the hydrodynamic resistance model: the friction coupling strength, $α$, and friction coupling range, $h_0$. Values of $α$ and $h_0$ for real-world rough particles can then be inferred by matching the pair rotation rate in the model to experimental observations when a dilute rough particle suspension is subjected to a linear shear flow. The same model is used to calculate the hydrodynamic contribution to the high frequency viscosity of rough particle suspensions. For different $α$ and $h_0$, we observe that the viscosity diverges differently depending on $h_0$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.