Paper detail

Parameter-robust Uzawa-type iterative methods for double saddle point problems arising in Biot's consolidation and multiple-network poroelasticity models

This work is concerned with the iterative solution of systems of quasi-static multiple-network poroelasticity (MPET) equations describing flow in elastic porous media that is permeated by single or multiple fluid networks. Here, the focus is on a three-field formulation of the problem in which the displacement field of the elastic matrix and, additionally, one velocity field and one pressure field for each of the $n \ge 1$ fluid networks are the unknown physical quantities. Generalizing Biot's model of consolidation, which is obtained for $n=1$, the MPET equations for $n\ge1$ exhibit a double saddle point structure. The proposed approach is based on a framework of augmenting and splitting this three-by-three block system in such a way that the resulting block Gauss-Seidel preconditioner defines a fully decoupled iterative scheme for the flux-, pressure-, and displacement fields. In this manner, one obtains an augmented Lagrangian Uzawa-type method, the analysis of which is the main contribution of this work. The parameter-robust uniform linear convergence of this fixed-point iteration is proved by showing that its rate of contraction is strictly less than one independent of all physical and discretization parameters. The theoretical results are confirmed by a series of numerical tests that compare the new fully decoupled scheme to the very popular partially decoupled fixed-stress split iterative method, which decouples only flow--the flux and pressure fields remain coupled in this case--from the mechanics problem. We further test the performance of the block triangular preconditioner defining the new scheme when used to accelerate the GMRES algorithm.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.