Paper detail

Parallel processor scheduling: formulation as multi-objective linguistic optimization and solution using Perceptual Reasoning based methodology

In the era of Industry 4.0, the focus is on the minimization of human element and maximizing the automation in almost all the industrial and manufacturing establishments. These establishments contain numerous processing systems, which can execute a number of tasks, in parallel with minimum number of human beings. This parallel execution of tasks is done in accordance to a scheduling policy. However, the minimization of human element beyond a certain point is difficult. In fact, the expertise and experience of a group of humans, called the experts, becomes imminent to design a fruitful scheduling policy. The aim of the scheduling policy is to achieve the optimal value of an objective, like production time, cost, etc. In real-life situations, there are more often than not, multiple objectives in any parallel processing scenario. Furthermore, the experts generally provide their opinions, about various scheduling criteria (pertaining to the scheduling policies) in linguistic terms or words. Word semantics are best modeled using fuzzy sets (FSs). Thus, all these factors have motivated us to model the parallel processing scenario as a multi-objective linguistic optimization problem (MOLOP) and use the novel perceptual reasoning (PR) based methodology for solving it. We have also compared the results of the PR based solution methodology with those obtained from the 2-tuple based solution methodology. PR based solution methodology offers three main advantages viz., it generates unique recommendations, here the linguistic recommendations match a codebook word, and also the word model comes before the word. 2-tuple based solution methodology fails to give all these advantages. Thus, we feel that our work is novel and will provide directions for the future research.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.