Paper detail

Parallel cross-validation: a scalable fitting method for Gaussian process models

Gaussian process (GP) models are widely used to analyze spatially referenced data and to predict values at locations without observations. In contrast to many algorithmic procedures, GP models are based on a statistical framework, which enables uncertainty quantification of the model structure and predictions. Both the evaluation of the likelihood and the prediction involve solving linear systems. Hence, the computational costs are large and limit the amount of data that can be handled. While there are many approximation strategies that lower the computational cost of GP models, they often provide only sub-optimal support for the parallel computing capabilities of current (high-performance) computing environments. We aim at bridging this gap with a parameter estimation and prediction method that is designed to be parallelizable. More precisely, we divide the spatial domain into overlapping subsets and use cross-validation (CV) to estimate the covariance parameters in parallel. We present simulation studies, which assess the accuracy of the parameter estimates and predictions. Moreover, we show that our implementation has good weak and strong parallel scaling properties. For illustration, we fit an exponential covariance model to a scientifically relevant canopy height dataset with 5 million observations. Using 512 processor cores in parallel brings the evaluation time of one covariance parameter configuration to less than 1.5 minutes. The parallel CV method can be easily extended to include approximate likelihood methods, multivariate and spatio-temporal data, as well as non-stationary covariance models.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.