Paper detail

Paradox of integration---Cellular automata approach

We discuss the self-deprecating strategy introduced by Peter Blau as one of stages of the process of social integration. Recently we have introduced a two-dimensional space of status, real and surface one ($A$ and $B$), and we have demonstrated that with this setup, the self-deprecating strategy efficiently prevents the rejection [K. Malarz and K. Kulakowski, International Journal of Modern Physics C 30, 1950040 (2019)]. There, the process of reducing the conflict was described by master equations, i.e. a set of differential equations describing evolution of density $v(A,B)$ of actors of status $(A,B)$. Here we reformulate the problem in terms of probabilistic cellular automata. The obtained results for number $n(A,B)$ of actors of status $(A,B)$ are qualitatively the same as in the previous approach, both for synchronous and asynchronous version of the automaton. Namely, an enhancement of the surface status compensates a deficiency of the real one.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.