Paper detail

Parabolic representations and generalized Riley polynomials

We generalize R. Riley's study about parabolic representations of two bridge knot groups to the general knots in $S^3$. We utilize the parabolic quandle method for general knot diagrams and adopt symplectic quandle for better investigation, which gives such representations and their complex volumes explicitly. For any knot diagram with a specified crossing $c$, we define a generalized Riley polynomial $R_c(y) \in \mathbb{Q}[y]$ whose roots correspond to the conjugacy classes of parabolic representations of the knot group. The sign-type of parabolic quandle is newly introduced and we obtain a formula for the obstruction class to lift to a boundary unipotent $\text{SL}_2 \mathbb{C}$-representation. Moreover, we define another polynomial $g_c(u)\in\mathbb{Q}[u]$, called $u$-polynomial, and prove that $R_c(u^2)=\pm g_c(u)g_c(-u)$. Based on this result, we introduce and investigate Riley field and $u$-field which are closely related to the invariant trace field. This method eventually leads to the complete classification of parabolic representations of knot groups along with their complex volumes and cusp shapes up to 12 crossings.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.