Paper detail

Parabolic Anderson model with voter catalysts: dichotomy in the behavior of Lyapunov exponents

We consider the parabolic Anderson model $\partial u/\partial t = κΔu + γξu$ with $u\colon\, \Z^d\times R^+\to \R^+$, where $κ\in\R^+$ is the diffusion constant, $Δ$ is the discrete Laplacian, $γ\in\R^+$ is the coupling constant, and $ξ\colon\,\Z^d\times \R^+\to\{0,1\}$ is the voter model starting from Bernoulli product measure $ν_ρ$ with density $ρ\in (0,1)$. The solution of this equation describes the evolution of a "reactant" $u$ under the influence of a "catalyst" $ξ$. In Gärtner, den Hollander and Maillard 2010 the behavior of the \emph{annealed} Lyapunov exponents, i.e., the exponential growth rates of the successive moments of $u$ w.r.t.\ $ξ$, was investigated. It was shown that these exponents exhibit an interesting dependence on the dimension and on the diffusion constant. In the present paper we address some questions left open in Gärtner, den Hollander and Maillard 2010 by considering specifically when the Lyapunov exponents are the a priori maximal value in terms of strong transience of the Markov process underlying the voter model.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.