Paper detail

PanorAMS: Automatic Annotation for Detecting Objects in Urban Context

Large collections of geo-referenced panoramic images are freely available for cities across the globe, as well as detailed maps with location and meta-data on a great variety of urban objects. They provide a potentially rich source of information on urban objects, but manual annotation for object detection is costly, laborious and difficult. Can we utilize such multimedia sources to automatically annotate street level images as an inexpensive alternative to manual labeling? With the PanorAMS framework we introduce a method to automatically generate bounding box annotations for panoramic images based on urban context information. Following this method, we acquire large-scale, albeit noisy, annotations for an urban dataset solely from open data sources in a fast and automatic manner. The dataset covers the City of Amsterdam and includes over 14 million noisy bounding box annotations of 22 object categories present in 771,299 panoramic images. For many objects further fine-grained information is available, obtained from geospatial meta-data, such as building value, function and average surface area. Such information would have been difficult, if not impossible, to acquire via manual labeling based on the image alone. For detailed evaluation, we introduce an efficient crowdsourcing protocol for bounding box annotations in panoramic images, which we deploy to acquire 147,075 ground-truth object annotations for a subset of 7,348 images, the PanorAMS-clean dataset. For our PanorAMS-noisy dataset, we provide an extensive analysis of the noise and how different types of noise affect image classification and object detection performance. We make both datasets, PanorAMS-noisy and PanorAMS-clean, benchmarks and tools presented in this paper openly available.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.