Paper detail

Pancharatnam-Zak phase

Three decades ago, in a celebrated work, Zak found an expression for the geometric phase acquired by an electron in a one-dimensional periodic lattice as it traverses the Bloch band. Such a geometric phase is useful in characterizing the topological properties and the electric polarization of the periodic system. Unfortunately Zak's expression suffers from two flaws: its value depends upon the choice of origin of the unit cell, and is gauge dependent. Here we explain that these flaws in Zak's expression arise from the assumption that the electron's adiabatic motion is cyclic in the sense of recurrence of the density matrix in course of time evolution. We find through a careful investigation that the system displays cyclicity in a generalized sense wherein the physical observables return in the course of evolution. This notion of generalized cyclicity paves the way for a correct and consistent expression for the geometric phase in this system, christened as Pancharatnam-Zak phase. Pancharatnam-Zak geometric phase does not suffer from the flaws inherent in Zak's expression, and correctly classifies the Bloch bands of the lattice. A natural filled band extension of the Pancharatnam-Zak phase is also constructed and studied.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.