Paper detail

Pair correlations and the survival of superconductivity in and around a super-conducting impurity

The problem of the survival of superconductivity in a small super-conducting grain placed in a metal substrate is addressed. For this aim the pair correlations and super-conducting gap around and inside a negative-U impurity in one and two dimensions is calculated, in a discrete tight-binding model and a continuous model. Using the Hartree-Fock-Gorkov mean-field decomposition, it is found that pairing inside the gap occurs when the system has a degeneracy between successive number of electron pairs, and is highly sensitive to the chemical potential. For finite pairing in the island, pair correlations in the normal part may either decay exponentially or be long-ranged, depending on the strength of interaction. In addition, it is shown analytically that there is a minimal island size under-which pairing vanishes, and that it scales as a power-law, rather then exponentially as in isolated grains. These results are interpreted in terms of screening of the negative-U impurity by the electron gas.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.